|
This publication is informative and thought provoking. The translation is smooth, understndable and easy to follow. I highly recommend it.
The ruler should think logically not emotionally. The state's social structure stood for justice and was divided into three groups. This dialogue is significant in that it helps to flesh out Plato's notion of what ultimately makes a person courageous. I found Grubb's translation to be the best of several I read. Plato's purpose in the Republic is not to perfect the character of people as an end but only as a means to an end.
Guardians/ Soldiers have courage/spirit. Rulers from whom the "philosopher king," will be selected, Guardians who are soldiers to protect the state, and the rest of the citizens classified as Artisans This division of citizens precipitates a discussion by Plato on the four virtues that these citizens will bring to the state. A. Plato in book four of the Republic does move on from his study of thumos as the prime motivating force to act courageously, to actually defining the virtue of courage. Plato fears that the Guardians could be susceptible to using their passion of aggressiveness against there own people. Therefore, he counsels that the Guardians who naturally possess aggressiveness have to also naturally possess the opposite characteristic of gentleness as well, so that their aggressiveness will only be used against the enemy and not their own citizenry. Plato's aim has a definite effect on his definition of courage.
Artisans have moderation of appetites. What is also important to observe is that he introduces a new element, that of education, in his definition of courage that was absent from his early dialogue Laches. Plato describes five types of government in the Republic:1.Aristocracy- Plato considered this the best form of government; aristocracy embodies wisdom of the philosopher king. The ruler must show a mastery of Arete = excellence vs. I find this is especially the case when exploring his ideas on how to educate the Guardians of the city to act courageously. Plato's project in the Republic is to form the "perfect" society. I paid close attention to Plato's thesis of courage in his Republic, which I expound below. In the Republic to insure excellent people Plato advocated selective breeding of excellent unmarried people who lived in communes, who did not own property.
akrasia= weakening of will, or no self-control. Once he [Plato] has introduced the city in 369 b-d, he immediately advances the thesis, which is to dominate the rest of the Republic, that the needs of its inhabitants can best be met if each person in it performs that single task, and that single task alone, for which he is naturally suited. 3.Oligarchy- rule by a rich elite, their vice is greed, the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Plato espouses the idea in the Republic that the Guardians need to possess certain natural qualities; such as strength, speed, and courage. Plato's ideal ruler, the "Philosopher King," should be 50 years old with 15 years of government experience and should have studied science and philosophy.
I read G. Consequently, Plato advises that heroes of Greek literature should be depicted as thoughtfully courageous and in control of their anger and physically resilient warriors. Plato's successor Aristotle, will argue against this notion in his EN. Finally, Plato argues in his education section of the Republic, that to counter the possibility of a Guardian developing an over excited passion of aggressiveness, it is necessary to teach the Guardians literature and music during the same time they undergo physical training.
Rulers- those trained to use reason and posses wisdom. First, Plato argues that the goal of education, which he compares to a sheepdog, is to watch over the Guardians; thus, with the proper education he believes the proper balance between exciting their aggressiveness and subduing it in the Guardians can be achieved. In addition, Plato argues that in order for people to be courageous they must also have an aggressive thumos [passion], which makes both people and animals fearless and determined. 5.Tyranny- this is the worst form of government.
It seems odd that Plato classifies courage as a natural quality possessed by certain people. Plato defines courage as a person's ability to subdue their aggressiveness by the orders of their reason in regards to what they should be fearful of regardless of their own feelings of pain or pleasure. 2.Timocracy- military government embodies virtues of honor and courage. "Reason allows us to live for something." Through reason we set goals and organize our lives around achieving goals. This automatically presupposes that not all people can practice the virtue of courage.
Grubb's translation of Plato's Republic for a graduate philosophy class. With this introduction of courage as a virtue, Plato takes another crack at defining courage. 4.Democracy- mob rule, and chaos, it represents akrasia people are slaves of their desires and have little self-control. Thus, Plato hopes this balanced approach to educating the Guardians will then lead to courage being a controlled and calm act of endurance in battle, instead of a foolhardy lust for blood letting and an emotional reaction to war. M.
Second, Plato believes that if aggressiveness is properly excited by physical training, then the Guardian will be courageous. If overly excited they will be like a wild beast devoid of grace and will become ignorant. In the history of philosophy this becomes known as the "four cardinal virtues"; wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice. Plato is very concerned that the archetypical heroic warrior Achilles, as depicted in Homer's epic poem the Iliad along with those depicted in Greek tragedies performed on stage, are bad examples for the Guardians to emulate. With this view of human nature in mind, in Plato's model society, he divides the citizens into three classes.
Plato argues that the government's duty to citizens is to provide justice, and educate citizens both men and women. Thus, Plato seems to be using the term andreia [courage] to cover (at the least) both courage proper, which can only exist in some kind of unity with the other virtues, and raw mettle or aggressiveness, which can exist in conjunction with various vices. The vice is selfishness, one power crazed person in control. Plato's goal is to match a person's character disposition to a job they are naturally inclined to perform in the city. Not only does Plato spend a significant amount of time advocating for the tools necessary to subdue the passions of the Guardians in book three of the Republic, but another important point in Plato's philosophy to consider is that since he believes that a Guardian's aggressiveness is influenced by literature he is very concerned by what type of literature is taught to them as well.
Plato's expounded definition of the virtue of courage is that a courageous act is an amalgamation of a person's natural passion of aggressiveness and properly educated rational beliefs over what is worthy regarding the possibility of losing their life or limb over.
The ruler should think logically not emotionally. The state's social structure stood for justice and was divided into three groups. This dialogue is significant in that it helps to flesh out Plato's notion of what ultimately makes a person courageous. I found Grubb's translation to be the best of several I read. Plato's purpose in the Republic is not to perfect the character of people as an end but only as a means to an end.
Guardians/ Soldiers have courage/spirit. Rulers from whom the "philosopher king," will be selected, Guardians who are soldiers to protect the state, and the rest of the citizens classified as Artisans This division of citizens precipitates a discussion by Plato on the four virtues that these citizens will bring to the state. A. Plato in book four of the Republic does move on from his study of thumos as the prime motivating force to act courageously, to actually defining the virtue of courage. Plato fears that the Guardians could be susceptible to using their passion of aggressiveness against there own people. Therefore, he counsels that the Guardians who naturally possess aggressiveness have to also naturally possess the opposite characteristic of gentleness as well, so that their aggressiveness will only be used against the enemy and not their own citizenry. Plato's aim has a definite effect on his definition of courage.
Artisans have moderation of appetites. What is also important to observe is that he introduces a new element, that of education, in his definition of courage that was absent from his early dialogue Laches. Plato describes five types of government in the Republic:1.Aristocracy- Plato considered this the best form of government; aristocracy embodies wisdom of the philosopher king. The ruler must show a mastery of Arete = excellence vs. I find this is especially the case when exploring his ideas on how to educate the Guardians of the city to act courageously. Plato's project in the Republic is to form the "perfect" society. I paid close attention to Plato's thesis of courage in his Republic, which I expound below. In the Republic to insure excellent people Plato advocated selective breeding of excellent unmarried people who lived in communes, who did not own property.
akrasia= weakening of will, or no self-control. Once he [Plato] has introduced the city in 369 b-d, he immediately advances the thesis, which is to dominate the rest of the Republic, that the needs of its inhabitants can best be met if each person in it performs that single task, and that single task alone, for which he is naturally suited. 3.Oligarchy- rule by a rich elite, their vice is greed, the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. Plato espouses the idea in the Republic that the Guardians need to possess certain natural qualities; such as strength, speed, and courage. Plato's ideal ruler, the "Philosopher King," should be 50 years old with 15 years of government experience and should have studied science and philosophy.
I read G. Consequently, Plato advises that heroes of Greek literature should be depicted as thoughtfully courageous and in control of their anger and physically resilient warriors. Plato's successor Aristotle, will argue against this notion in his EN. Finally, Plato argues in his education section of the Republic, that to counter the possibility of a Guardian developing an over excited passion of aggressiveness, it is necessary to teach the Guardians literature and music during the same time they undergo physical training.
Rulers- those trained to use reason and posses wisdom. First, Plato argues that the goal of education, which he compares to a sheepdog, is to watch over the Guardians; thus, with the proper education he believes the proper balance between exciting their aggressiveness and subduing it in the Guardians can be achieved. In addition, Plato argues that in order for people to be courageous they must also have an aggressive thumos [passion], which makes both people and animals fearless and determined. 5.Tyranny- this is the worst form of government.
It seems odd that Plato classifies courage as a natural quality possessed by certain people. Plato defines courage as a person's ability to subdue their aggressiveness by the orders of their reason in regards to what they should be fearful of regardless of their own feelings of pain or pleasure. 2.Timocracy- military government embodies virtues of honor and courage. "Reason allows us to live for something." Through reason we set goals and organize our lives around achieving goals. This automatically presupposes that not all people can practice the virtue of courage.
Grubb's translation of Plato's Republic for a graduate philosophy class. With this introduction of courage as a virtue, Plato takes another crack at defining courage. 4.Democracy- mob rule, and chaos, it represents akrasia people are slaves of their desires and have little self-control. Thus, Plato hopes this balanced approach to educating the Guardians will then lead to courage being a controlled and calm act of endurance in battle, instead of a foolhardy lust for blood letting and an emotional reaction to war. M.
Second, Plato believes that if aggressiveness is properly excited by physical training, then the Guardian will be courageous. If overly excited they will be like a wild beast devoid of grace and will become ignorant. In the history of philosophy this becomes known as the "four cardinal virtues"; wisdom, courage, moderation, and justice. Plato is very concerned that the archetypical heroic warrior Achilles, as depicted in Homer's epic poem the Iliad along with those depicted in Greek tragedies performed on stage, are bad examples for the Guardians to emulate. With this view of human nature in mind, in Plato's model society, he divides the citizens into three classes.
Plato argues that the government's duty to citizens is to provide justice, and educate citizens both men and women. Thus, Plato seems to be using the term andreia [courage] to cover (at the least) both courage proper, which can only exist in some kind of unity with the other virtues, and raw mettle or aggressiveness, which can exist in conjunction with various vices. The vice is selfishness, one power crazed person in control. Plato's goal is to match a person's character disposition to a job they are naturally inclined to perform in the city. Not only does Plato spend a significant amount of time advocating for the tools necessary to subdue the passions of the Guardians in book three of the Republic, but another important point in Plato's philosophy to consider is that since he believes that a Guardian's aggressiveness is influenced by literature he is very concerned by what type of literature is taught to them as well.
Plato's expounded definition of the virtue of courage is that a courageous act is an amalgamation of a person's natural passion of aggressiveness and properly educated rational beliefs over what is worthy regarding the possibility of losing their life or limb over.
I spent over a month reading this book carefully as I am a complete beginner in philosophy, and honestly it was rather intimidating at first, but I found the experience surprisingly manageable and pleasant not to mention educational. I also read the introduction before reading this book, and Sparknote afterwards to make sure I understood most of the main ideas, which was helpful. This was a very satisfying reading experience for me.
This book will answer these questions. He claims that for a country to be just, the ruler and its followers also have to be just. Why this magnificent idiom is attributed to him. Most people associate Plato with the term platonic friendship, which is based on reciprocal understanding. Peruse this book if you can for it scrutinizes all the constituents of a successful state and its leader. It is imperative that he is knowledgeable in music, poetry, physical training, and mathematics.
Plato argues that a ruler must be a philosopher.
Believed to have been born in 428 BCE, Plato was an earnest student of Socrates.
In the same manner we like or dislike a particular plot of a story, we can only agree or disagree with Plato's philosophy.
Who is Plato.
Hence, a lengthy discussion on what justice is preludes the founding of an idyllic country.
So staunch was the scholar's esteem of his mentor that he wrote this book.In this dialogue, Socrates and Glaucon languorously discuss how to found a perfect republic or a nation.
Both agree that to have an ideal form of government, it must be governed by a supreme ruler or in gentler term a model president.
Even if the establishment of a perfect state seems visionary, the words of Socrates as recollected by Plato remain the underpinning of ethics in politics and laws.
It is a sensible read and a reminder of things we already know as decent human beings but we tend not to practice.
|
